TESTING ON TRUCKS AND CARS
UPDATE FOR 2025
We developed recently a new set of our chips for diesel engines. They are giving constant results of fuel economy above 20 percent. We will publish the detailed results soon.
___________________________________
RESULTS OF PREVIOUS YEARS WITH PREVIOUS GENERATION OF OUR CHIPS SEE BELOW.
As we have now much higher fuel economy, these results are only for historical interest.
This list contains only a small part of our previous years results.
For other historical testing results of the engine on a test bed with fuel economy of up to 21 percent, please see here
GROUP 1 - PRECISE TESTING
The testing in this group was done by road test, at a constant speed of 70 km per hour, using cruise control to keep the speed constant. The first run was without our catalyst, and the second with our catalyst. All conditions in both runs were similar - speed, the road, distance, wheel pressure, and weight of the car. Outside temperature differed not more than 3 degrees.
Fuel consumption was measured this way - the tank was filled to the very top, so the fuel started to leak out of it. After that, the drive was done. After the drive, the fuel was filled again till the top. The amount of filled fuel was red from the fuel station pump. This amount was considered as consumption. More details on testing you can find here
VW Passat Variant GTE ( 2023), engine 1.4 TSI PHEV, HYBRID, VIN: WVWZZZ3CZPE022211 ECONOMY 9.1 %, confirmed also by OBFCM measurement.
Toyota Prado, ( 2022), Gasoline, 2.7 liters, ECONOMY 26 %
Seat, ( 2010), diesel, engine VW BTS, 1.6 L. 105 HP, ECONOMY 6%
Mercedes Sprinter diesel, ( 2010), W906 316, Engine 651, ECONOMY 39 %
Honda Goldwing motorcycle, gasoline, 1.8 L, (2013), ECONOMY 25 %
Toyota Corolla, gasoline, (1997), vin JT164AEB103022783, Engine 4 AM, ECONOMY 11 %
Honda CR-V, gasoline, ( 1999), VIN JHLRD1866XC018511, 147 HP, engine B20Z2 ECONOMY 11.2%
Reno Megan Diesel GT, (2020 ), ECONOMY 8.1 %
JETOUR T2 ( 2024), gasoline, VIN HJRPBGJB2RB134376, ECONOMY 10.5%
EXCEED LX gasoline, (2023), engine 1.5 L E4T15C I4 turbo, ECONOMY 24 %
FORD PUMA, gasoline, (2022), engine 1.0 L, ECOBOOST, HYBRID, VIN WF02XXERK2NT13544, ECONOMY 29 %
HYUNDAI BAYON (2022), gasoline, ECONOMY 11.4 %
SCANIA Truck, (2022), 560 HP , ECONOMY 8.3%
VOLVO Truck, ( 2021), Diesel, 400 HP, ECONOMY 8.1%
GROUP 2 - LONG TERM TESTING
The testing in this group was done by clients, driving under the same conditions to their office and back. Two weeks without our catalyst, two weeks with our catalyst.
Several cases were done by different methods and are mentioned separately below.
Fuel consumption was measured by recording the total distance and total fuel consumed. The fuel consumption was measured by the fuel station pump meters.
These tests were very close to WLTP test conditions, which are now used in many countries.
Toyota Land Cruiser (2018) Economy 10 %
Toyota Land Cruiser (2021) Economy 10 %
Mercedes GLS 500 (2016) Economy 11 %
Mercedes G 500 (2021) Economy 15 %
Mercedes G 500 (2022) Economy 14 %
Skoda Kodiak TS 2.0 TSI 245 PS, (2023) , VIN TMB LU7 NSX P8046337 Economy 10 %
BELAZ 75131 diesel,(2009), 1600 HP, engine Cummins KTA 50-C, ECONOMY 11.2 %. These tests were done on the coal mining field for two months.
Renault Magane II , gasoline , (2002). 5 cars were tested with results of 9.1 - 15.8 %
Renault Laguna, Gasoline, (2001), Economy 7%
Renault Magane I, Gasoline, ( 1999 ), Economy 16.3%
Renault Scenic (1998), Gasoline, Economy 7.5 %
Mitsubishi Lancer, (1998), Gasoline, engine 2.0 L I4 turbo 4G63T, economy 5 %
BMW 525, (1980), Gasoline, engine 2.5 L M30 straight-6, economy 22%
VW POLO, (2013), VIN XW8ZZZ61ZEG014631, 106 HP, engine CFN, ECONOMY 10-22%. A year-long extensive test was conducted on this car, and the range of economy was determined depending on outside temperatures.
DAF truck, Diesel, ( 2011), type 105/410, Economy 10 %. Tests during 4 weeks.
Ford Focus ( 2005), gasoline. Tests were made on 40 same cars over two months and the average economy was 16 %.